needb2
04-03 02:36 PM
Hello Bytech,
what questions did he ask you? please explain the hard part for the benefit of others .
Thanks
what questions did he ask you? please explain the hard part for the benefit of others .
Thanks
wallpaper dresses 2010 Icons - Vector Icon Set 3 find us on facebook logo eps.
qplearn
12-12 04:02 PM
Given the fact that only one senator was opposed to last week's passage of EB benefits package, I have my doubts about the efficacy of their own campaign, regardless of their crowing.
That the package was not passed was more due to one individual's extreme (and possibly bigoted) world view, and not due to a carefully crafted opposition to our efforts.
No doubt numbers usa is an organization with redoubtable resources, but I also think we are creating a bogeyman out of mere shadows.
Only one in the senate, many in the house. During the LD, it did not have to go to house and we came sooooooooooo close. :( If it goes to house during the regular sessions, it may fail again.
That the package was not passed was more due to one individual's extreme (and possibly bigoted) world view, and not due to a carefully crafted opposition to our efforts.
No doubt numbers usa is an organization with redoubtable resources, but I also think we are creating a bogeyman out of mere shadows.
Only one in the senate, many in the house. During the LD, it did not have to go to house and we came sooooooooooo close. :( If it goes to house during the regular sessions, it may fail again.
amsgc
06-17 05:43 PM
Is your current salary less than the proferred salary in the LC? If yes, I am not sure how to answer your question. I don't think this should be an issue as the ability to pay has been established by the approval of I140. However, you should try to get this answer from your lawyer.
Hi Kodak,
Thanks for your response - you are a very patient and kind person!
My current salaray is more than the one on the LC.
I intend to provide 2 letters from the employer:
- Confirmation of future employment + salary (given in LC) (I-485)
- Certification of current employment + salary(Current) (for affidavit of support)
I am not sure if it is ok to have the two different figures, or keep them the same as the current salary. That's all. So my question to you is, what did you do? Did your employment letter state the salary in the LC, or did it state your current salary at the time.
I am not going to bug you over this anymore :)
Thanks!
Ams
Hi Kodak,
Thanks for your response - you are a very patient and kind person!
My current salaray is more than the one on the LC.
I intend to provide 2 letters from the employer:
- Confirmation of future employment + salary (given in LC) (I-485)
- Certification of current employment + salary(Current) (for affidavit of support)
I am not sure if it is ok to have the two different figures, or keep them the same as the current salary. That's all. So my question to you is, what did you do? Did your employment letter state the salary in the LC, or did it state your current salary at the time.
I am not going to bug you over this anymore :)
Thanks!
Ams
2011 2011 fromthe videocon logo eps, find us on facebook logo eps. hair
ocpmachine
07-02 03:50 PM
After reading the whole document, I feel better now and switched off the panic button, i think we all overeacted for a moment here.
I just dont get this, Attorneys are supposed to be experts in the matter they practice(immigration), yet we know better than them and interprit USCIS circular better than these attorneys...this whole immigration system is a milking cow and i am sick of this.
I just dont get this, Attorneys are supposed to be experts in the matter they practice(immigration), yet we know better than them and interprit USCIS circular better than these attorneys...this whole immigration system is a milking cow and i am sick of this.
more...
anurakt
09-20 04:01 PM
Good ones ghost, Anurakt, I think you can use these as teaser lines to link to the IV website.
I am planning to put this and link the pdf flier you gave me.....
I am planning to put this and link the pdf flier you gave me.....
sandy_anand
09-26 12:09 PM
According to the FOIA info
Your position is 9079 in the Green Card Queue based on your Country of Chargeability "India", Priority Date "Mar-08" and Category "EB2" .
Your Expected Date of Adjudication is Jun, 2012.
According to USCIS website info
Your position is 47598 in the Green Card Queue based on your Country of Chargeability "India", Priority Date "Mar-08" and Category "EB2" .
Your Expected Date of Adjudication is Apr, 2024.
Doesn't make sense :confused: since the total pending 485s are 233,816. With a total available 140,000 visas minus around 15% for consular process makes 119,000 visas available per year (assuming numbers aren't wasted and spillover is efficiently applied). How come it will take another 15 years for my number to become current? Something's wrong with the IV calculator. But thanks for the effort. I had travel plans in Apr 2024, will cancel them now since my number will come up for adjudication in that month.;) Thanks for the headsup! :rolleyes:
Your position is 9079 in the Green Card Queue based on your Country of Chargeability "India", Priority Date "Mar-08" and Category "EB2" .
Your Expected Date of Adjudication is Jun, 2012.
According to USCIS website info
Your position is 47598 in the Green Card Queue based on your Country of Chargeability "India", Priority Date "Mar-08" and Category "EB2" .
Your Expected Date of Adjudication is Apr, 2024.
Doesn't make sense :confused: since the total pending 485s are 233,816. With a total available 140,000 visas minus around 15% for consular process makes 119,000 visas available per year (assuming numbers aren't wasted and spillover is efficiently applied). How come it will take another 15 years for my number to become current? Something's wrong with the IV calculator. But thanks for the effort. I had travel plans in Apr 2024, will cancel them now since my number will come up for adjudication in that month.;) Thanks for the headsup! :rolleyes:
more...
vbkris77
05-03 05:07 PM
Beauty of the lobby is that it will have both sides. If anti can make noise about more immigrants, business can lobby about resource availability. So it should find a balance.. It is the same infamous "death panels" argument that didn't win in Healthcare debate.
So I wouldn't worry as much about this as Ron G would..
Guys,
The below clause, as I feared is likely to kick all the goodies included for EB. Can IV confirm it's not the case or work against this clause?
I rarely quote Ron...here is one such occasion to show that my worry about the 'clause' is not alone:
Honestly, is there still a chance for CIR to be debated and pass this summer? (http://www.immigration-information.com/forums/pending-immigration-legislation/10860-honestly-is-there-still-a-chance-for-cir-to-be-debated-and-pass-this-summer.html)
"
What you are missing is the part about the "employment commission." This has been proposed (and shot down) several times in the past. It proposes that the employment based categories and quotas be kept open so that a commission can make determinations as to the needs of American businesses and recommend changes to Congress. Under this system, which will be dominated by unions, the commission will determine whether shortages exist in different fields. To the extent that they determine that a shortage exists, they will recommend a fixed level of immigration for that field. Putting aside the insanity of government trying to tell business who they need, the lag times between recognized shortages being acknowledged, the commission proposing remedies, and Congress acting will ensure that US businesses will offshore the rest of the tech jobs that are still here. Can you imagine tech companies going to this commission and begging for more IT personnel, only to have the Programmer's Guild step up (as they always do) and argue that there are too many IT workers here already? This portion of the legislation should be named the "Kill the IT Industry in America Act of 2010."
What good will it do to eliminate per country quotas if no one can qualify to immigrate?
"
Thanks!
So I wouldn't worry as much about this as Ron G would..
Guys,
The below clause, as I feared is likely to kick all the goodies included for EB. Can IV confirm it's not the case or work against this clause?
I rarely quote Ron...here is one such occasion to show that my worry about the 'clause' is not alone:
Honestly, is there still a chance for CIR to be debated and pass this summer? (http://www.immigration-information.com/forums/pending-immigration-legislation/10860-honestly-is-there-still-a-chance-for-cir-to-be-debated-and-pass-this-summer.html)
"
What you are missing is the part about the "employment commission." This has been proposed (and shot down) several times in the past. It proposes that the employment based categories and quotas be kept open so that a commission can make determinations as to the needs of American businesses and recommend changes to Congress. Under this system, which will be dominated by unions, the commission will determine whether shortages exist in different fields. To the extent that they determine that a shortage exists, they will recommend a fixed level of immigration for that field. Putting aside the insanity of government trying to tell business who they need, the lag times between recognized shortages being acknowledged, the commission proposing remedies, and Congress acting will ensure that US businesses will offshore the rest of the tech jobs that are still here. Can you imagine tech companies going to this commission and begging for more IT personnel, only to have the Programmer's Guild step up (as they always do) and argue that there are too many IT workers here already? This portion of the legislation should be named the "Kill the IT Industry in America Act of 2010."
What good will it do to eliminate per country quotas if no one can qualify to immigrate?
"
Thanks!
2010 girlfriend find us on facebook
snathan
07-30 09:20 AM
Guys,
I am on H1B and no EAD/AP. My stamping expired long time back. So do I need the Transfer Visa for Germany if I need to travel to India...if so, whats the procedure to get one.
Also what are the countries does not require the transit visa if the stamping expired.
Thanks,
I am on H1B and no EAD/AP. My stamping expired long time back. So do I need the Transfer Visa for Germany if I need to travel to India...if so, whats the procedure to get one.
Also what are the countries does not require the transit visa if the stamping expired.
Thanks,
more...
pappu
11-30 01:48 PM
New York Times, WaPo, LA Times and other National Print media
krugman@nytimes.com, vannatta@nytimes.com, tiwein@nytimes.com, miwein@nytimes.com, weisman@nytimes.com, liptaka@nytimes.com, bobherb@nytimes.com, reissc@nytimes.com, public@nytimes.com, dabrooks@nytimes.com, dakirk@nytimes.com, dasang@nytimes.com, editorial@nytimes.com, erschm@nytimes.com, executiveeditor@nytimes.com, febarr@nytimes.com, foreign@nytimes.com, justice@nytimes.com, burns@nytimes.com, cushman@nytimes.com, markoff@nytimes.com, judym@nytimes.com, letters@nytimes.com, ligree@nytimes.com, nytnews@nytimes.com, managing-editor@nytimes.com, liberties@nytimes.com, mossm@nytimes.com, national@nytimes.com, news-tips@nytimes.com, nicholas@nytimes.com, pekilb@nytimes.com, ropear@nytimes.com, rotone@nytimes.com, stolberg@nytimes.com, slabaton@nytimes.com, weisman@nytimes.com, lewin@nytimes.com, tiwein@nytimes.com, topurd@nytimes.com, washington@nytimes.com, safire@nytimes.com, executive-editor@nytimes.com, managing-editor@nytimes.com, bduffy@usnews.com, letters@usnews.com, gborger@usnews.com, jallen@usnews.com, kwalsh@usnews.com, mzuckerman@usnews.com, vpope@usnews.com, whispers@usnews.com, alevin@usatoday.com, astone@usatoday.com, bslavin@usatoday.com, bnichols@usatoday.com, bwelch@usatoday.com, editor@usatoday.com, dmoniz@usatoday.com, ghager@usatoday.com, gflanders@usatoday.com, jlawrence@usatoday.com, jdrinkard@usatoday.com, jbiskupic@usatoday.com, editor@usatoday.com, jkeen@usatoday.com, kkiely@usatoday.com, kjohnson@usatoday.com, mhall@usatoday.com, rbenedetto@usatoday.com, rwolf@usatoday.com, spage@usatoday.com, tsquitieri@usatoday.com, tlocy@usatoday.com, theforum@usatoday.com, wshapiro@usatoday.com, letters@economist.com, amity.shlaes@ft.com, letters.editor@ft.com, philip.stephens@ft.com, greg.hitt@wsj.com, wsj.ltrs@wsj.com, wsjcontact@dowjones.com, jeanne.cummings@wsj.com, jane_mayer@newyorker.com, themail@newyorker.com, deborah.barfield@newsday.com, ken.fireman@newsday.com, Editors@newsweek.com, WebEditors@newsweek.com, Letters@newsweek.com, letters@time.com, lettersbwol@businessweek.com, letters@washingtontimes.com, gpierce@washingtontimes.com, jmccaslin@washingtontimes.com, dkeil@bloomberg.net, wroberts@bloomberg.net, ghall@bloomberg.net, hprzybyla@bloomberg.net, jcohen@bloomberg.net, NewsAlert@letters.washingtonpost.com, letters@washpost.com, webnews@washingtonpost.com, georgewill@washpost.com, jimhoagland@washpost.com, ombudsman@washpost.com, powellm@washpost.com, kurtzh@washpost.com, abramowitz@washpost.com, achenbachj@washpost.com, allenh@washpost.com, allenm@washpost.com, <aranam@washpost.com, argetsinger@washpost.com, asherm@washpost.com, chuck.babbington@washingtonpost.com, bakerp@washpost.com, balzd@washpost.com, barbashf@washpost.com, barkerk@washpost.com, barkinr@washpost.com, barrj@washpost.com, barrs@washpost.com, beckerj@washpost.com, behrp@washpost.com, belmanf@washpost.com, bennettp@washpost.com, benningv@washpost.com, bersellie@washpost.com, beyersd@washpost.com, blumj@washpost.com, bonesteelm@washpost.com, boustanyn@washpost.com, religion@washpost.com, bredemeier@washpost.com, brennanp@washpost.com, brooksd@washpost.com, brownw@washpost.com, browar57@aol.com, carlsonp@washpost.com, castanedar@washpost.com, cavendishs@washpost.com, chans@washpost.com, chandlerc@washpost.com, rajiv@washpost.com, cheaterry@washpost.com, chod@washpost.com, claiborneb@washpost.com, clarkp@washpost.com, cohensh@washpost.com, cohnd@washpost.com, coopermana@washpost.com, copelandl@washpost.com, davenportc@washpost.com, davisp@washpost.com, dawsone@washpost.com, dayk@washpost.com, deanec@washpost.com, deaned@washpost.com, deinerj@washpost.com, deyoungk@washpost.com, dirdam@washpost.com, dobbsm@washpost.com, drezenr@washpost.com, duttj@washpost.com, dvorakp@washpost.com, edsallt@washpost.com, eggend@washpost.com, ahrensf@washpost.com, aizenmann@washpost.com, nightwatch@washpost.com, donovanc@washpost.com, newsonline@bbc.co.uk, editor@guardianunlimited.co.uk, politics.editor@guardianunlimited.co.uk, foreign@guardian.co.uk, letters@guardian.co.uk, politics@guardian.co.uk, online@guardian.co.uk, foreigneditor@independent.co.uk, newseditor@independent.co.uk, letters@iht.com, ellengoodman@globe.com, ombud@globe.com, kcooper@globe.com, letter@globe.com, johnson@globe.com, brelis@globe.com, oliphant@globe.com, editor@scoop.co.nz, alastair@scoop.co.nz, selwyn@scoop.co.nz, jhoward@minidata.co.nz, andrew@scoop.co.nz, wade@scoop.co.nz, jgreenburg@tribune.com, jzeleny@tribune.com, jzuckman@tribune.com, jcrewdson@tribune.com, MPossley@tribune.com, rkemper@tribune.com, bjapsen@tribune.com, csimpson@tribune.com, fjames@tribune.com, GWashburn@tribune.com, gdelama@tribune.com, mdorning@tribune.com, JPeres@tribune.com, cgarrett@tribune.com, oped@csps.com, vanslambrouckp@csps.com, ingwersonm@csps.com, cookd@csps.com, dillinj@csps.com, jonesc@csps.com, armstrongs@csps.com, sullivanc@csps.com, grierp@csps.com, axtmank@csps.com, chinnid@csps.com, kieferf@csps.com, marksa@csps.com, mclaughlina@csps.com, ron@csmonitor.com, richeyw@csps.com, grays@csps.com, letters@latimes.com, readers.rep@latimes.com, aaron.zitner@latimes.com, barbara.serrano@latimes.com, barry.siegel@latimes.com, James.Rainey@latimes.com, bill.rempel@latimes.com, bob.drogin@latimes.com, chuck.neubauer@latimes.com, davan.maharaj@latimes.com, david.kelly@latimes.com, david.savage@latimes.com, david.willman@latimes.com, david.zucchino@latimes.com, deborah.nelson@latimes.com, don.frederick@latimes.com, don.woutat@latimes.com, doyle.mcmanus@latimes.com, ellen.barry@latimes.com, esther.schrader@latimes.com, faye.fiore@latimes.com, glenn.bunting@latimes.com, greg.miller@latimes.com, janet.hook@latimes.com, joan.springhetti@latimes.com, joel.havemann@latimes.com, johanna.neuman@latimes.com, john.glionna@latimes.com, john.hendren@latimes.com, john.stewart@latimes.com, jonathan.peterson@latimes.com, josh.getlin@latimes.com, josh.meyer@latimes.com, judy.pasternak@latimes.com, julie.bowles@latimes.com, ken.silverstein@latimes.com, kevin.sack@latimes.com, leslie.hoffecker@latimes.com, letters@latimes.com, linda.finestone@latimes.com, lisa.getter@latimes.com, maggie.farley@latimes.com, maria.laganga@latimes.com, marjorie.miller@latimes.com, mark.barabak@latimes.com, mark.mazzetti@latimes.com, mark.porubcansky@latimes.com, maryann.meek@latimes.com, mary.braswell@latimes.com, mary.curtius@latimes.com, matea.gold@latimes.com, maura.reynolds@latimes.com, michael.finnegan@latimes.com, michael.kinsley@latimes.com, michael.muskal@latimes.com, millie.quan@latimes.com, nick.anderson@latimes.com, patrick.mcdonnell@latimes.com, patt.morrison@latimes.com, paul.feldman@latimes.com, peter.wallsten@latimes.com, readers.rep@latimes.com, richard.cooper@latimes.com, richard.simon@latimes.com, robin.abcarian@latimes.com, roger.ainsley@latimes.com, scott.gold@latimes.com, scott.kraft@latimes.com, stephanie.simon@latimes.com, steve.braun@latimes.com, tom.furlong@latimes.com, tom.hamburger@latimes.com, tom.mccarthy@latimes.com, elizabeth.mehren@latimes.com, alan.miller@latimes.com
krugman@nytimes.com, vannatta@nytimes.com, tiwein@nytimes.com, miwein@nytimes.com, weisman@nytimes.com, liptaka@nytimes.com, bobherb@nytimes.com, reissc@nytimes.com, public@nytimes.com, dabrooks@nytimes.com, dakirk@nytimes.com, dasang@nytimes.com, editorial@nytimes.com, erschm@nytimes.com, executiveeditor@nytimes.com, febarr@nytimes.com, foreign@nytimes.com, justice@nytimes.com, burns@nytimes.com, cushman@nytimes.com, markoff@nytimes.com, judym@nytimes.com, letters@nytimes.com, ligree@nytimes.com, nytnews@nytimes.com, managing-editor@nytimes.com, liberties@nytimes.com, mossm@nytimes.com, national@nytimes.com, news-tips@nytimes.com, nicholas@nytimes.com, pekilb@nytimes.com, ropear@nytimes.com, rotone@nytimes.com, stolberg@nytimes.com, slabaton@nytimes.com, weisman@nytimes.com, lewin@nytimes.com, tiwein@nytimes.com, topurd@nytimes.com, washington@nytimes.com, safire@nytimes.com, executive-editor@nytimes.com, managing-editor@nytimes.com, bduffy@usnews.com, letters@usnews.com, gborger@usnews.com, jallen@usnews.com, kwalsh@usnews.com, mzuckerman@usnews.com, vpope@usnews.com, whispers@usnews.com, alevin@usatoday.com, astone@usatoday.com, bslavin@usatoday.com, bnichols@usatoday.com, bwelch@usatoday.com, editor@usatoday.com, dmoniz@usatoday.com, ghager@usatoday.com, gflanders@usatoday.com, jlawrence@usatoday.com, jdrinkard@usatoday.com, jbiskupic@usatoday.com, editor@usatoday.com, jkeen@usatoday.com, kkiely@usatoday.com, kjohnson@usatoday.com, mhall@usatoday.com, rbenedetto@usatoday.com, rwolf@usatoday.com, spage@usatoday.com, tsquitieri@usatoday.com, tlocy@usatoday.com, theforum@usatoday.com, wshapiro@usatoday.com, letters@economist.com, amity.shlaes@ft.com, letters.editor@ft.com, philip.stephens@ft.com, greg.hitt@wsj.com, wsj.ltrs@wsj.com, wsjcontact@dowjones.com, jeanne.cummings@wsj.com, jane_mayer@newyorker.com, themail@newyorker.com, deborah.barfield@newsday.com, ken.fireman@newsday.com, Editors@newsweek.com, WebEditors@newsweek.com, Letters@newsweek.com, letters@time.com, lettersbwol@businessweek.com, letters@washingtontimes.com, gpierce@washingtontimes.com, jmccaslin@washingtontimes.com, dkeil@bloomberg.net, wroberts@bloomberg.net, ghall@bloomberg.net, hprzybyla@bloomberg.net, jcohen@bloomberg.net, NewsAlert@letters.washingtonpost.com, letters@washpost.com, webnews@washingtonpost.com, georgewill@washpost.com, jimhoagland@washpost.com, ombudsman@washpost.com, powellm@washpost.com, kurtzh@washpost.com, abramowitz@washpost.com, achenbachj@washpost.com, allenh@washpost.com, allenm@washpost.com, <aranam@washpost.com, argetsinger@washpost.com, asherm@washpost.com, chuck.babbington@washingtonpost.com, bakerp@washpost.com, balzd@washpost.com, barbashf@washpost.com, barkerk@washpost.com, barkinr@washpost.com, barrj@washpost.com, barrs@washpost.com, beckerj@washpost.com, behrp@washpost.com, belmanf@washpost.com, bennettp@washpost.com, benningv@washpost.com, bersellie@washpost.com, beyersd@washpost.com, blumj@washpost.com, bonesteelm@washpost.com, boustanyn@washpost.com, religion@washpost.com, bredemeier@washpost.com, brennanp@washpost.com, brooksd@washpost.com, brownw@washpost.com, browar57@aol.com, carlsonp@washpost.com, castanedar@washpost.com, cavendishs@washpost.com, chans@washpost.com, chandlerc@washpost.com, rajiv@washpost.com, cheaterry@washpost.com, chod@washpost.com, claiborneb@washpost.com, clarkp@washpost.com, cohensh@washpost.com, cohnd@washpost.com, coopermana@washpost.com, copelandl@washpost.com, davenportc@washpost.com, davisp@washpost.com, dawsone@washpost.com, dayk@washpost.com, deanec@washpost.com, deaned@washpost.com, deinerj@washpost.com, deyoungk@washpost.com, dirdam@washpost.com, dobbsm@washpost.com, drezenr@washpost.com, duttj@washpost.com, dvorakp@washpost.com, edsallt@washpost.com, eggend@washpost.com, ahrensf@washpost.com, aizenmann@washpost.com, nightwatch@washpost.com, donovanc@washpost.com, newsonline@bbc.co.uk, editor@guardianunlimited.co.uk, politics.editor@guardianunlimited.co.uk, foreign@guardian.co.uk, letters@guardian.co.uk, politics@guardian.co.uk, online@guardian.co.uk, foreigneditor@independent.co.uk, newseditor@independent.co.uk, letters@iht.com, ellengoodman@globe.com, ombud@globe.com, kcooper@globe.com, letter@globe.com, johnson@globe.com, brelis@globe.com, oliphant@globe.com, editor@scoop.co.nz, alastair@scoop.co.nz, selwyn@scoop.co.nz, jhoward@minidata.co.nz, andrew@scoop.co.nz, wade@scoop.co.nz, jgreenburg@tribune.com, jzeleny@tribune.com, jzuckman@tribune.com, jcrewdson@tribune.com, MPossley@tribune.com, rkemper@tribune.com, bjapsen@tribune.com, csimpson@tribune.com, fjames@tribune.com, GWashburn@tribune.com, gdelama@tribune.com, mdorning@tribune.com, JPeres@tribune.com, cgarrett@tribune.com, oped@csps.com, vanslambrouckp@csps.com, ingwersonm@csps.com, cookd@csps.com, dillinj@csps.com, jonesc@csps.com, armstrongs@csps.com, sullivanc@csps.com, grierp@csps.com, axtmank@csps.com, chinnid@csps.com, kieferf@csps.com, marksa@csps.com, mclaughlina@csps.com, ron@csmonitor.com, richeyw@csps.com, grays@csps.com, letters@latimes.com, readers.rep@latimes.com, aaron.zitner@latimes.com, barbara.serrano@latimes.com, barry.siegel@latimes.com, James.Rainey@latimes.com, bill.rempel@latimes.com, bob.drogin@latimes.com, chuck.neubauer@latimes.com, davan.maharaj@latimes.com, david.kelly@latimes.com, david.savage@latimes.com, david.willman@latimes.com, david.zucchino@latimes.com, deborah.nelson@latimes.com, don.frederick@latimes.com, don.woutat@latimes.com, doyle.mcmanus@latimes.com, ellen.barry@latimes.com, esther.schrader@latimes.com, faye.fiore@latimes.com, glenn.bunting@latimes.com, greg.miller@latimes.com, janet.hook@latimes.com, joan.springhetti@latimes.com, joel.havemann@latimes.com, johanna.neuman@latimes.com, john.glionna@latimes.com, john.hendren@latimes.com, john.stewart@latimes.com, jonathan.peterson@latimes.com, josh.getlin@latimes.com, josh.meyer@latimes.com, judy.pasternak@latimes.com, julie.bowles@latimes.com, ken.silverstein@latimes.com, kevin.sack@latimes.com, leslie.hoffecker@latimes.com, letters@latimes.com, linda.finestone@latimes.com, lisa.getter@latimes.com, maggie.farley@latimes.com, maria.laganga@latimes.com, marjorie.miller@latimes.com, mark.barabak@latimes.com, mark.mazzetti@latimes.com, mark.porubcansky@latimes.com, maryann.meek@latimes.com, mary.braswell@latimes.com, mary.curtius@latimes.com, matea.gold@latimes.com, maura.reynolds@latimes.com, michael.finnegan@latimes.com, michael.kinsley@latimes.com, michael.muskal@latimes.com, millie.quan@latimes.com, nick.anderson@latimes.com, patrick.mcdonnell@latimes.com, patt.morrison@latimes.com, paul.feldman@latimes.com, peter.wallsten@latimes.com, readers.rep@latimes.com, richard.cooper@latimes.com, richard.simon@latimes.com, robin.abcarian@latimes.com, roger.ainsley@latimes.com, scott.gold@latimes.com, scott.kraft@latimes.com, stephanie.simon@latimes.com, steve.braun@latimes.com, tom.furlong@latimes.com, tom.hamburger@latimes.com, tom.mccarthy@latimes.com, elizabeth.mehren@latimes.com, alan.miller@latimes.com
hair find us on facebook logo eps.
amitjoey
07-09 01:53 PM
There is already a lot of media attention - we need to pursue every single lead that we get. Contact your local newspapers, your local public radio station. If there is a contact to be pursued - don't post a comment here that core or someone else needs to talk; you go ahead and talk to that person yourself. If you are in doubt over what to say, just go through the press release (http://www.touchdownusa.org/pdf/USCISFlowerCampaign.pdf) and talk about that.
Thanks english_august, this pdf summarises it all, great effort!. I am sending this to the local newspaper outlets here. Thanks again.
Thanks english_august, this pdf summarises it all, great effort!. I am sending this to the local newspaper outlets here. Thanks again.
more...
bartekmar
12-08 09:01 PM
How about setting up a Google Adwords campaign with keywords specific to h1b and employment based green card to increase immigrant community awareness. The campaign would run only this month and would target those who have the greatest interest in this bill being passed. Those who click on the ad would be directed to page explaining our efforts and urging people to call their senators.
We could set up a donation fund specifically to pay for the ads for one month and could publicly show on the site who has paid and reports from the campaign showing exactly how much was spent for advertising. This would ensure that money is going directly to this campaign. If each of us donate few bucks it would be sufficient to run such a campaign.
If the site owners would support this idea, I would be glad to help in this effort.
We could set up a donation fund specifically to pay for the ads for one month and could publicly show on the site who has paid and reports from the campaign showing exactly how much was spent for advertising. This would ensure that money is going directly to this campaign. If each of us donate few bucks it would be sufficient to run such a campaign.
If the site owners would support this idea, I would be glad to help in this effort.
hot FIND US ON FACEBOOK LOGO EPS
bigboy007
07-26 02:13 PM
I am not commending myself but she also told me to wait for 30-45 days but to see whether accepted with a visa number or returned ( not rejected) did u speak with level 2 or level 1 ?
more...
house Set eps find us onjun,
anurakt
12-05 02:42 PM
I think Waldenpond did give an update before the start of the LD session. He clearly said that we should not expect much out of LD and has already set some expectation. Also for the sake of dsicussions if at all anything is going on I am pretty sure they are putting all the efforts that are needed. Also remember that the anti immigration people do watch this forum and any critical inforamtion should not be leaked to jeopadize our standing. Keep patience. As far as asking for contribution goes, I think with a population of 6000 member we are not able to donate even 50$ each. Everything in this country walks on money ! most of the contribution are done by the same people everytime...
tattoo makeup find us on facebook
starscream
07-31 03:07 PM
http://www.c-span.org/Watch/C-SPAN_wm.aspx
its showing the house covergage - we need webcast of the commitee deliberations NOt the house coverage
its showing the house covergage - we need webcast of the commitee deliberations NOt the house coverage
more...
pictures girlfriend Organic Label Vector Graphic find us on facebook logo eps. camera
broadcaster
11-21 10:56 AM
Congratulations VKMXL, could you share with us, what kind of actions did you take, or you just wait?
dresses find us on facebook logo eps.
sam571
03-04 03:29 PM
I have a question,, all this problems happen with people from consultancy or with also people having full-time jobs in direct company?
more...
makeup find us on facebook logo eps
GCard_Dream
05-23 02:01 PM
By now we all know that according to this new immigration bill if your I-140 is not filed by May 21st, 2007, you will not be able to continue with the old system and would have to wait for the new merit system. We also know that we have roughly half a million people waiting in EB line and since spouses will be counted in the visa number, total number of people waiting is about a million. However, there is only 450,000 (i.e. 90k * 5 year) visas available for people in the old system, which clearly indicates that not everyone who are waiting will be accommodated.
Because of the cut off date of May 21st, 2007, not all half a million EB folks will be eligible to continue with old system. I just wanted to get an idea as to what percentage of people have not yet filed their I-140 by May 21st, 2007. This will give us a general idea about how many people will actually be able to continue with old system and if 450,000 visas allocated for 5 years will be enough.
Because of the cut off date of May 21st, 2007, not all half a million EB folks will be eligible to continue with old system. I just wanted to get an idea as to what percentage of people have not yet filed their I-140 by May 21st, 2007. This will give us a general idea about how many people will actually be able to continue with old system and if 450,000 visas allocated for 5 years will be enough.
girlfriend wallpaper fromthe videocon logo eps, find us on facebook logo eps.
rsharma
09-26 10:47 AM
Result for belmontboy:
Your position is 47480 in the Green Card Queue based on your Country of Chargeability "India", Priority Date "Oct-07" and Category "EB2" .
Your Expected Date of Adjudication is Apr, 2024.
spill over considered.
Wait time tracker doesnot make any sense....
Thank you IV core for getting the data and also creating this adjudication calculator.
However I too agree with Belmontboy that these dates looks unrealistic. It will be highly appreciated if IV core can post the formulations used to calculate the dates.
Once we know the formulations for these adjudication date calculator sused by IV this will authenticate these adjudication date calcultors created by IV.
But again I would like to thank IV core team and all of us for making USCIS make the 485 data public. This shows that if we all work together we can get the immigration system reformed that will help us as well as this great country.
Your position is 47480 in the Green Card Queue based on your Country of Chargeability "India", Priority Date "Oct-07" and Category "EB2" .
Your Expected Date of Adjudication is Apr, 2024.
spill over considered.
Wait time tracker doesnot make any sense....
Thank you IV core for getting the data and also creating this adjudication calculator.
However I too agree with Belmontboy that these dates looks unrealistic. It will be highly appreciated if IV core can post the formulations used to calculate the dates.
Once we know the formulations for these adjudication date calculator sused by IV this will authenticate these adjudication date calcultors created by IV.
But again I would like to thank IV core team and all of us for making USCIS make the 485 data public. This shows that if we all work together we can get the immigration system reformed that will help us as well as this great country.
hairstyles jersey shore logo vector.
gconmymind
08-01 04:29 PM
Its all about RD now. Anyone with EB-2 PD before Jun-06 stands a very good chance of getting approved in August if they filed 485 before July 15th last year.
cdeneo
06-15 05:19 PM
Can one take a chest X-ray prior to TB test since it is highly likely for a person of Indian origin to test positive?
Also, does an X-ray taken in the last 6 months count or should this be taken in the week/month of the TB test?
Please advise.
Also, does an X-ray taken in the last 6 months count or should this be taken in the week/month of the TB test?
Please advise.
gaz
10-27 03:00 PM
nope not teach culture...
i'm not a parent - but i can appreciate the fact that someone would want their kid in the hands of someone who is from a known culture, speaks the same language maybe, possibly has similar food habits etc.
I agree with your latter statement - about doing it legally. If its more expensive and someone can afford it its their choice. I don't think anyone here has the right to judge about the persons intentions when starting this thread - its not any of our business until we have all the information. Seems most people here call commonsense jumping the gun and using the most negative view available - ask yourself if you would say the same to another person doing the same thing from a "developed" country? Why? Is it because there is no abuse there ... or is it that they would not tolerate your accusation, and someone here may?
Sir, I find the logic amusing... are you seriously trying to tell me you buy the argument that the main reason the maid is to be brought in is to teach the kid Indian culture (which the parents, presumably, are too busy to do themselves)?? And it is not about money?...
Hehe.. and you call ME stupid? Hilarious..
As I have always said, if you want to bring someone in, do it by all means. Nobody has any problems with it. Just do it legally. And doing it legally is far more expensive than hiring locally.
And basic commonsense tells me that the good fellow starting this thread has absolutely no intention of doing that, which is why many here are ticked off.
i'm not a parent - but i can appreciate the fact that someone would want their kid in the hands of someone who is from a known culture, speaks the same language maybe, possibly has similar food habits etc.
I agree with your latter statement - about doing it legally. If its more expensive and someone can afford it its their choice. I don't think anyone here has the right to judge about the persons intentions when starting this thread - its not any of our business until we have all the information. Seems most people here call commonsense jumping the gun and using the most negative view available - ask yourself if you would say the same to another person doing the same thing from a "developed" country? Why? Is it because there is no abuse there ... or is it that they would not tolerate your accusation, and someone here may?
Sir, I find the logic amusing... are you seriously trying to tell me you buy the argument that the main reason the maid is to be brought in is to teach the kid Indian culture (which the parents, presumably, are too busy to do themselves)?? And it is not about money?...
Hehe.. and you call ME stupid? Hilarious..
As I have always said, if you want to bring someone in, do it by all means. Nobody has any problems with it. Just do it legally. And doing it legally is far more expensive than hiring locally.
And basic commonsense tells me that the good fellow starting this thread has absolutely no intention of doing that, which is why many here are ticked off.
No comments:
Post a Comment